Published before the New York open · 08:00 ET · Connecticut, United States
NQ & gold GEX levels — updated daily, free
Where option-dealer hedging sits this morning on Nasdaq-100 and gold futures, written for people who trade the futures contract rather than the options.
01 / The morning run
The levels, and the run that produced them
Two files
One run
08:00 ET
Run completed Updated Computed once a day · never live
Both files below come from the same run. They are a photograph of where dealer hedging sat at 08:00 ET, not a forecast of where price is going, and nothing on this page updates after that.
Nasdaq-100 futures · NQ · one tick = 0.25 index points
| Level | NQ price | Distance from the run price |
|---|---|---|
| Price at the run | 30,788.00NQ index points | —reference for every distance below |
| Call wall | 31,144.00NQ index points | +356.00index points · 1,424 ticks · 0.25 points per tick |
| Gamma flip | 30,468.00NQ index points | −320.00index points · 1,280 ticks · 0.25 points per tick |
| Put wall | 29,067.00NQ index points | −1,721.00index points · 6,884 ticks · 0.25 points per tick |
| Peak gamma strike | 31,144.00NQ index points | +356.00index points · 1,424 ticks · 0.25 points per tick |
| Max pain | 29,815.00NQ index points | −973.00index points · 3,892 ticks · 0.25 points per tick |
| Gamma regime | Positive gammastate of dealer hedging, not a direction | —not a price |
Derived from listed QQQ option positioning · all levels within the plausible band
Gold futures · GC · one tick = 0.10 US dollars per ounce
| Level | GC price | Distance from the run price |
|---|---|---|
| Price at the run | 4,358.00US dollars per ounce | —reference for every distance below |
| Call wall | 4,972.00US dollars per ounce | +614.00dollars per ounce · 6,140 ticks · 0.10 dollars per tick |
| Gamma flip | 4,304.00US dollars per ounce | −54.00dollars per ounce · 540 ticks · 0.10 dollars per tick |
| Put wall | 4,309.00US dollars per ounce | −49.00dollars per ounce · 490 ticks · 0.10 dollars per tick |
| Peak gamma strike | 4,972.00US dollars per ounce | +614.00dollars per ounce · 6,140 ticks · 0.10 dollars per tick |
| Max pain | 4,420.00US dollars per ounce | +62.00dollars per ounce · 620 ticks · 0.10 dollars per tick |
| Gamma regime | Positive gammastate of dealer hedging, not a direction | —not a price |
Derived from listed GLD option positioning · how the gold levels are made · all levels within the plausible band
02 / For futures traders
What these three levels actually mean when you trade the contract
Almost everything written about gamma exposure is written for someone trading S&P 500 index options. That is not what you are doing. You are long or short a futures contract, you have no option position at all, and none of the Greeks on this page are yours. So the only question worth answering is the mechanical one: who is forced to buy or sell futures near these prices, and why.
Call wall
The strike above the current price where the model finds the largest concentration of dealer gamma, each strike’s calls and puts netted against each other — gamma, not the raw pile of open interest: a far strike can hold an enormous pile and force no hedging at all. Where the model puts the dealers long gamma there, staying hedged means selling into strength and buying into weakness, and that is what makes the strike behave like resistance. The selling has nothing to do with anyone’s opinion of the Nasdaq; the position demands it. If the model has the side wrong that day, the same discipline runs the other way and the strike is no barrier at all.
For you, on the contract: it is the most common place for a morning trend to run out of fuel. It is not resistance in the classical sense — nobody standing there thinks the market is expensive. It is a place where mechanical supply shows up, which is a reason to be sceptical of a fresh breakout into it and a reason a supply zone sitting on top of it has help it would not otherwise have.
Put wall
The mirror image below the current price: the strike where the model finds the largest concentration of dealer gamma on the put side, again with each strike’s calls and puts netted against each other. Where the model puts dealer gamma positive there, staying hedged into a decline means buying, so a sell-off arriving there meets a mechanical bid. Where it puts dealer gamma negative — common, and the case to check for first when the wall sits below the gamma flip — there is no such bid, and the hedging near it runs with the move. Read it then as the lower edge of the modelled range, not as a floor.
For you, on the contract: where the gamma sign there is positive it is where a decline commonly decelerates, and in either case it is the level whose loss changes the character of the day. Below it, whatever was underneath the market is not underneath it any more, and moves that had been grinding tend to travel.
Gamma flip
The single most useful of the three, and the one nobody explains in futures terms. It is the price at which the aggregate dealer hedge changes sign — the border between hedging that leans against the move and hedging that runs with it.
Above the flip, dealers are hedging in the direction that dampens: they sell into strength and buy into weakness. Ranges compress, pullbacks are shallow, and a market can spend the whole session going nowhere with real conviction. Below the flip, the same hedging amplifies: they sell into weakness and buy into strength. Ranges expand, retests fail more often, and moves that look overdone keep going.
None of that is an entry. It is a range expectation, which is a different and more useful thing. It is the difference between planning a session in which a Nasdaq-100 move of forty index points (160 ticks at 0.25 points per tick) is a big day, and planning one in which the same distance is a single leg before lunch. Your stop distance, your target distance and your patience all sit downstream of that.
Schematic · three levels, one session · not a recorded session
Schematic only · no instrument, no price, no outcome claimed
One honest caveat, stated here rather than buried: these are tendencies in hedging mechanics, not rules. Walls get taken out. The flip gets crossed and immediately recrossed. A large enough buyer does not care what any dealer is hedging. Anyone who tells you a level like this holds is selling you something.
What these levels mean, in full → Trading NQ on MetaTrader 5? The real setup →
Previous session · 21 September 2026 → Every archived session of September 2026 → What is in the archive, and what is missing →
03 / Regime
Above the flip and below it are two different markets
If you take one thing from this page, take this. The same instrument, on the same day, behaves differently on either side of the gamma flip, and the reason is not sentiment. It is that the hedging flow reverses direction.
Above the flip — the state the files above call positive gamma — hedging is stabilising. Expect tighter ranges, shallower pullbacks, more of the session spent inside prior value, and breakouts that struggle to extend. A zone you have marked has a better chance of doing its job, because the flow is helping it rather than steamrolling it.
Below the flip — negative gamma — hedging is destabilising. Expect wider ranges, faster legs, retests that fail, and gaps that do not fill politely. This is where a well-drawn zone can be right about location and still be run through, and it is the main reason a trader who only ever practised in one regime gets confused by the other.
The regime is a property of the session, not of your trade. It changes what a reasonable stop distance is on Nasdaq-100 futures and on gold futures, and it changes how much patience a level deserves. It never tells you which way to go.
Schematic · the same level in two regimes · not a recorded session
Schematic only · no instrument, no price, no outcome claimed
04 / Provenance
How this morning’s file was built, and what it cannot do
Nasdaq-100 futures and gold futures both have listed options, but the liquid, cleanly-observable option positioning for each sits in an exchange-traded fund — QQQ for the Nasdaq-100, GLD for gold. So the run reads positioning on the fund, finds the strikes, then converts each strike into a futures price using the ratio between the two markets at the moment of the run. That conversion is the part everyone else hides, so here it is in full.
- Option data
- Listed QQQ options for the Nasdaq-100 and listed GLD options for gold, read once per session, at the run.
- Proxy price at the run
- QQQ 741.43 US dollars · GLD 394.42 US dollars. Every converted level below is anchored to these two prices.
- Proxy strikes
- Nasdaq-100 — call 750.00, put 700.00, zero gamma 733.72, all in US dollars of QQQ. Gold — call 450.00, put 390.00, zero gamma 389.57, all in US dollars of GLD.
- Conversion ratio
- Nasdaq-100 — 41.525 NQ index points per 1.00 US dollar of QQQ. Gold — 11.049 US dollars per ounce per 1.00 US dollar of GLD. The ratio is recomputed every run, because it drifts.
- Gamma regime
- Nasdaq-100 — Positive gamma. Gold — Positive gamma. A description of how dealers are hedging, and nothing more.
- Net gamma exposure
- Nasdaq-100 — 4.50B. Gold — 514.16M. Passed through in the source’s own units, unconverted, because converting a number whose definition you did not set is how errors get laundered into confidence.
- Put and call open interest
- Nasdaq-100 — 1.38 puts per call. Gold — 0.56 puts per call. As published by the source.
- Run timestamp
- . This is the timestamp inside the data file itself, not the time this page was uploaded. The freshness indicator at the top of the page reads that same field, which is why the page can tell you it is stale.
- Sanity check
- Nasdaq-100 — all levels within the plausible band. Gold — all levels within the plausible band. The run refuses to publish a level that falls outside a plausible band around the futures price, and says so rather than printing it.
- Deliberately not published
- The source also emits a directional label of its own. It is dropped before this page is built. This site does not print anyone’s call on direction, including a vendor’s, and a page that quietly passed one through would be doing exactly that.
What this cannot do
It is a proxy. Positioning in an exchange-traded fund is not positioning in the futures contract, and the ratio between them is an approximation that is at its worst on the days you most want it — a violent open, an expiry, a session where the fund and the future disagree.
It is computed once. Positioning changes through the day and this page does not follow it. By the afternoon these are a record of where things stood at eight o’clock, which is still useful and is not the same as current.
It is not a live dashboard and does not pretend to be one. If you need positioning that moves, you need a data terminal, and you should go and pay for one. What this page is good for is the twenty minutes before the New York open, which is when the decision that matters actually gets made.
Explanatory sections on this page last reviewed 8 September 2026. The tables above are rebuilt every session; this review date is maintained by hand and is not touched by the daily job.
05 / In practice
These are context. The zones are the decision.
The order matters, and it is the same every morning. The levels on this page get marked first, because they tell me what kind of session I am probably in and where mechanical flow is waiting. Then the supply and demand zones get drawn on the higher timeframe and carried down, exactly as they would be on a day I had never heard of gamma. Then the zone gets graded, and the grade decides whether anything happens.
A gamma level never puts me in a trade and never takes me out of one. What it does is change how much I trust a zone standing in front of it. A demand zone sitting just above the put wall in a positive-gamma session is a very different proposition from the same zone drawn below the flip on a session where ranges are expanding — same drawing, same instrument, different weather.
Most mornings the honest conclusion is that nothing lines up and the correct action is none. That is the process working, not the process failing.
That order — levels first, zone second, grade third — is how I learned to grade a zone in the first place, and the paid course walks through it in full.
Get the free Zone Score checklist How the zones are drawn → The two-minute market prep →
06 / House rules
What this page will never do
- No signals. Not one number here is a reason to buy or sell anything, on any instrument, at any time.
- No claim of being live. One run, once a session, timestamped from the data file itself. Nothing on this page moves or pretends to.
- No silent staleness. If the morning run fails, the page says so at the top, marks every table, and shows you the date of the file you are actually reading.
- No borrowed opinions. The source publishes a directional label alongside this data and it is discarded before the page is built.
- No bare numbers. Every price and every distance names its instrument, its unit and its tick size, because a number without those is not information.
- No archive of old sessions. One address, rewritten each morning. Yesterday’s levels are not useful and a stack of dated pages would only be here to farm search results.
- No results, no win rates, no account figures. Not on this page, not anywhere on this site. The disclaimer says the same thing at length.